The following example illustrates that vertices need not only represent branchings but also crossed lines.
\begin{picture}(22000,22000) \drawline\fermion[\NE\REG](0,0)[6000] \drawvertex\photon[\NE 4](\pbackx,\pbacky)[7] \drawline\fermion[\N\REG](\vertexonex,\vertexoney)[\photonlengthx] \drawline\fermion[\N\REG](\fermionbackx,\fermionbacky)[\plengthy] \drawline\fermion[\NW\REG](\vertextwox,\vertextwoy)[6000] \end{picture}Producing
we'd have added
\THICKLINES\flipvertex\drawvertex\photon[\NE 3](\vertexthreex,\vertexthreey)[4] \flipvertex\drawvertex\photon[\SE 3](\vertexfourx,\vertexfoury)[4]and put a
\THICKLINES
modifier before the first and a
\THINLINES
following it.
Note how we had to use flipvertex in order to make the sets of vertices
connect properly. In point of fact the above pictures are flawed since
the two fermion-fermion-photon vertices are not symmetric. In this instance
it would be more appropriate to draw two long photons instead of a vertex.
Photonic vertices may also be stemmed, as will be discussed in
the next chapter (however see section 2.9 for an example of stemmed
photons). Finally we point out, in the form of an exercise, that
being able to produce photons with an odd number of half-wiggles again
has its uses.
Exercise: Draw the following using . How could you
replace the fermion on the right by a scalar?
Note that the diagonal fermion segments on the right have half of the length
of the vertical segment.